McAfee FW 7.5.1 or Outpost?

From: Jay (jay@nomail.com)
Date: 08/23/02 

From: "Jay" <jay@nomail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:23:54 +0200

I'm currently using Outpost, which is free and good. Do you think getting
McAfee would be a wise move or not? I'm not talking about the money, I just
want to know if McAfee is more reliable, easier to use and less obtrusive
than Outpost.
Also, are there any compatibility problems with Windows XP and F-Prot AV for
Win?

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Firewall preferences
    ... >>| If you put AdSubtract and a good anti-virus package like McAfee ... OutPost has plugin support which can be a useful ... > like McAfee and substitute Outpost? ... The "weird" thing is that AVs are like ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Firewall preferences
    ... >like McAfee and substitute Outpost? ... consider that McAfee is an anti-virus program (that includes some ... >is going to have a tough act to follow if they intend to replace it ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Firewall preferences
    ... consider that McAfee is an anti-virus program (that includes some ... >>You're not comparing apples with apples. ... >free and AdSubtract Pro is 30 bucks, ... Outpost comes in two versions: ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Firewall preferences
    ... OutPost has plugin support which can be a useful ... like McAfee and substitute Outpost? ... winamp plug-ins are mostly of a gimmick nature. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: McAfee FW 7.5.1 or Outpost?
    ... > I'm currently using Outpost, ... > McAfee would be a wise move or not? ... do that and also get rid of the great support, you will be close to what ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)