Re: Port 23 Open Despite Firewalls
From: karl [x y] (jamescagney90210@excite.com)Date: 08/07/02
- Next message: Lanwench: "Re: Anyone Setup a Win2K VPN with IPSec like this?"
- Previous message: Usenet News Poster: "Re: Sonicwall question"
- In reply to: Richie: "Port 23 Open Despite Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: Port 23 Open Despite Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "karl [x y]" <jamescagney90210@excite.com> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:12:51 -0400
"Richie" <newsmaster@scifi-central.net> wrote in message
news:AyY39.11859$dA5.122997924@news-text.cableinet.net...
> At the place where I work a Windows 2000 server has access to the internet
> with Win98 workstations connected. NAT is implemented.
>
> No matter what firewall I install (zonealarm, Kerio - Tiny - or Outpost)
the
> gibson research website reports that the ports are all closed (not stealth
> though) except for port 23, which is shown as open no matter how many
rules
> I set up to kepp it blocked.
>
> Any ideas what could be causing this?
> After disposing of Zonealarm 3 which is total crap that kept on crashing
the
> server and Outpost, which regularly caused the server to grind to a halt,
> I'm now using the newest version of Tiny (now Kerio).
First, try scanning with another web page or port scanner program [such as
superscan from www.foundstone.com] to confirm that this is not a false alarm
on the part of grc.com
I would be more concerned first with determining whether Telnet services are
running on the target machine, since you want this disabled unless
absolutely necessary. On a Windows machine, you can run fport from
www.foundstone.com to see if port 23 is really listening. You should make
sure your systems have been hardened and correctly configured first...
installing a firewall is not a replacement for hardening.
The system being scanned is probably the one that is performing NAT. If
your system that is performing NAT does not have a firewall installed, then
that could be one reason for this.
Don't worry about the stealthing, it's overrated. Ports being closed is
probably good enough for your purposes.
- Next message: Lanwench: "Re: Anyone Setup a Win2K VPN with IPSec like this?"
- Previous message: Usenet News Poster: "Re: Sonicwall question"
- In reply to: Richie: "Port 23 Open Despite Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: Port 23 Open Despite Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|