Re: McAffe 6 vs. ZoneLabs?

From: Duane Arnold (darnold92@Insightbb.com)
Date: 07/07/02 

From: "Duane Arnold" <darnold92@Insightbb.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 06:38:44 GMT

In my opinion both are trash.. I have been hacked with ZA. I have not really
used McAffe, but if the firewall is anything like its virus protection
software I used a few years back, it's trash too. Look at BlackIce Defender
PC 3.5 or Sygate. I use BID 3.5 and have no problems. A basic user can use
either one of them.

"Ctenos" <ctenos@att.netspam (reply w/o spam)> wrote in message
news:tliV8.79069$UT.5383484@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> I installed the basic version of ZoneAlarm, then upgraded from McAfee 4 to
6
> which
> also has a firewall. Which is better for a basic user?
>
> Thanks-
>
> Ctenos
> (Win98)
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: McAffe 6 vs. ZoneLabs?
    ... I use Tiny Personal Firewall. ... I bought ZoneAlarm but it was a real pain. ... Which is better for a basic user? ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Mcafee.com firewall anygood?
    ... >I have heard nothing good or bad about McAfee's firewall. ... >McAfee's AV is trash based on the last time I used it, ... the others (not NPF or ZA, ZA sucks rocks IMO - totally unstable, ... How does hardware compare to software? ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Zonealarm slowing down Internet Explorer
    ... Zone Alarm is a piece of trash. ... There really is no need to use a separate firewall. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Zonealarm slowing down Internet Explorer
    ... I would NEVER recommend that anyone use the built in XP firewall. ... > Zone Alarm is a piece of trash. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Zonealarm slowing down Internet Explorer
    ... > I would NEVER recommend that anyone use the built in XP firewall. ... >> Zone Alarm is a piece of trash. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
Quantcast