Re: DMZ When to use
From: Tore Lund (toreld@netscape.net)Date: 07/05/02
- Next message: larstr@no-spam.colargol.tihlde.org: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Previous message: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- In reply to: svek: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Next in thread: larstr@no-spam.colargol.tihlde.org: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Reply: larstr@no-spam.colargol.tihlde.org: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Reply: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Reply: Eirik Seim: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Tore Lund <toreld@netscape.net> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 14:24:08 +0200
svek wrote:
>
> Internet
> |
> |
> Firewall
> | <-- DMZ
> |-- server 1
> |-- server 2
> |-- server 3
> |
> Firewall
> | <-- Private LAN
> |-- workstation 1
> |-- workstation 2
> |-- workstation 3
Maybe slightly off-topic, but I wonder how this is done physically. For
instance, we might have a small company with poor economy. They want to
implement this arrangement of 2 firewalls, 3 servers and 3 workstations
with the minimum number of boxes. I suppose it can be done with less
than 8 boxes, but what would be the minimum?
--
Tore
- Next message: larstr@no-spam.colargol.tihlde.org: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Previous message: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- In reply to: svek: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Next in thread: larstr@no-spam.colargol.tihlde.org: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Reply: larstr@no-spam.colargol.tihlde.org: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Reply: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Reply: Eirik Seim: "Re: DMZ When to use"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|