(no subject)
From: Clifton T. Sharp Jr. (clifto@clifto.com)Date: 10/31/02
- Next message: : "Re: Secure Link To Multiple Vendors"
- Previous message: : "(no subject)"
- In reply to: Tim Haynes: "(no subject)"
- Next in thread: Tim Haynes: "(no subject)"
- Reply: Tim Haynes: "(no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Clifton T. Sharp Jr." <clifto@clifto.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:11:40 -0600
Tim Haynes wrote:
> "Clifton T. Sharp Jr." <clifto@clifto.com> writes:
> > various sources...
> >> > No, I don't feel like allowing you to spy on me.
> >>
> >> Can you give pointers to the source where it oversteps the bounds
> >> described above?
> >
> > Well, right after it says it's completely anonymous, it tells you it
> > records both source and destination address from every datagram.
>
> How else would you expect something fulfilling the description of "agent
> listening for SYN packets" to operate?
I understand and agree. But that takes away any vestige of truth in the
claim of complete anonymity, doesn't it? (Note that that's the only part
I'm taking issue with.)
-- It is better to light just one little candle than to curse the darkness. If everyone lit just one little candle, the EPA would outlaw candles.
- Next message: : "Re: Secure Link To Multiple Vendors"
- Previous message: : "(no subject)"
- In reply to: Tim Haynes: "(no subject)"
- Next in thread: Tim Haynes: "(no subject)"
- Reply: Tim Haynes: "(no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
