VPN, Road Warriors, and Nat question
From:Date: 10/29/02
- Next message: jcayo: "Raptor Firewall"
- Previous message: : "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Next in thread: W. B.: "Re: VPN, Road Warriors, and Nat question"
- Reply: W. B.: "Re: VPN, Road Warriors, and Nat question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:40:48 -0000
There's tons of info about setting up VPNs on the net, but I can't seem to
get my head straight on one thing: most people these days connect via a
NAT-ed connection (either via an ADSL router or their ISP, or corporate
LAN). Very few connect straight out on their own IP.
If I set up a VPN server on my company's LAN, will anyone ever be able to
connect to it if they are behind a NAT firewall beyond my control? If not,
am I just wasting my time fiddling with poptop, FreeSWAN and all the others
(neither of which I've got working yet)?
Should I just forget VPN completely and instead kill Vint Cerf for choosing
such a tiny 32-bit address space that we have to use NAT in the first place?
These geniuses can be such idiots.
But seriously, any ideas on being able to get NAT connections to VPN would
be appreciated.
JJ
- Next message: jcayo: "Raptor Firewall"
- Previous message: : "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Next in thread: W. B.: "Re: VPN, Road Warriors, and Nat question"
- Reply: W. B.: "Re: VPN, Road Warriors, and Nat question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|