Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc.
From:Date: 10/28/02
- Next message: : "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Previous message: Anonymous: "Re: ZoneAlarm v3.1.395"
- In reply to: Melinda Shore: "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Next in thread: : "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Reply: : "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:59:15 GMT
Agreed.
That's the point I was making about router or firewall (whichever is
handling the NAT allocations) re-direction or mapping. It still potentially
leaves an internal host open. However, if there are no configured mappings,
then the machine is relatively safe from a direct penetration..
J.D.
--Network Tiger Teams "Because You Just Never Know Who's Sniffing Around In Your Information Jungle" www.networktiger.com
"Melinda Shore" <shore@panix.com> wrote in message news:apkbds$6h3$1@panix2.panix.com... > In article <Zdiv9.152766$La5.500001@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>, > Network Tiger Teams <information@networktiger.com> wrote: > >If the internal (NAT'd) machine has no services or ports exposed to the > >outside via router or firewall redirection, then no, it cannot be "seen" by > >any outside scanning or penetration attempts.. > > It depends on the NAT type. Hosts behind a full cone NAT > are going to be vulnerable if any mappings, transient or > not, are installed in the NAT. Restricted cone NATs are > safer and symmetric NATs are the safest, but restricted cone > NATs are increasingly rare. A NAT is no substitute for a > firewall and proper application security. > -- > Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - shore@panix.com > If you send me harassing email, I'll probably post it
- Next message: : "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Previous message: Anonymous: "Re: ZoneAlarm v3.1.395"
- In reply to: Melinda Shore: "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Next in thread: : "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Reply: : "Re: Systems behind NAT - port scanning etc."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|