Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee
From: bassbag (bassbag@bodybags.dragon.wales)Date: 10/27/02
- Next message: Netmasker: "Dynamic packet filtering.."
- Previous message: : "Re: firewall options..."
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: bassbag <bassbag@bodybags.dragon.wales> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:59:52 -0000
In article <ofamrukteu3anfvvfndbsm7lc4gmcvgfk5@4ax.com>,
badnews@hansenonline.net says...
> On 26 Oct 2002 23:17:46 GMT, UBCHI2 spoketh
>
> >How can these major companies sell security products without spyware scanning?
> >Spyware passes throught the virus checks and other checks of the top security
> >software products.
> >
>
> Yes, since spyware is not a virus, a virus scanner wouldn't pick it
> up... Doesn't sound flawed to me.
>
> Lars M. Hansen
> http://www.hansenonline.net
> (replace 'badnews' with 'lars' in e-mail address)
>
You may be interested to read this article about what this "spyware" does
and click the "some" and "others" links to see which antivirus
manufactures doesnt consider it a trojan ,and decide for yourself what
you consider it.
http://www.cexx.org/dlder.htm
me
- Next message: Netmasker: "Dynamic packet filtering.."
- Previous message: : "Re: firewall options..."
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
