Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee
From: [ Doc Jeff ] (me@privacy.net)Date: 10/27/02
- Next message: : "port 520 UDP traffic inside router"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: rapping noise, gun noise?"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Next in thread: Z : "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Reply: Z : "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "[ Doc Jeff ]" <me@privacy.net> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 02:11:33 -0800
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:50:12 GMT, Lars M. Hansen
<badnews@hansenonline.net> wrote:
>On 26 Oct 2002 23:17:46 GMT, UBCHI2 spoketh
>
>>How can these major companies sell security products without spyware scanning?
>>Spyware passes throught the virus checks and other checks of the top security
>>software products.
>>
>
>Yes, since spyware is not a virus, a virus scanner wouldn't pick it
>up... Doesn't sound flawed to me.
Norton's AV checks for and identifies "Hacking Tools". Why not
spyware too?
{{{ Huggs }}}
-- Doc "Aphrodite's Evostick" Jeff Proud supporter of Nitallica, MEOW, NHOFB, PLOW, SWWOP, PeacefulHaven.net, COTSE.net, the United States of America, and any sentient being who can hug and/or be hugged.
- Next message: : "port 520 UDP traffic inside router"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: rapping noise, gun noise?"
- In reply to: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Next in thread: Z : "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Reply: Z : "Re: Ridiculous weakness of Norton and McAffee"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading