Re: VPN Question
From:Date: 10/16/02
- Next message: : "Re: net send"
- Previous message: John Elsbury: "Re: Do I need a firewall?"
- In reply to: Bernie M: "Re: VPN Question"
- Next in thread: Mesomorf: "Re: VPN Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:58:53 -0700
"Bernie M" <while_up_late@night> wrote:
>
>"Mesomorf" <newsgroup@only.please> wrote in message
>news:ZvRq9.1693$hV3.75878@newsb.telia.net...
>>
>> "Bernie M" <while_up_late@night> wrote:
>>
>> > Surfing the net from the office is completely different to surfing from
>> home
>> > while also having a VPN back to the office. Traffic to/from the
>Internet
>> > doesn't use the VPN tunnel to go out through the office firewall. How
>> does
>> > the office firewall protect a PC that's browsing the Internet via their
>> ISP?
>>
>> You are confusing me.. but letīs say that the remote users browse the
>> internet through the VPN (that means they are using the companys
>> gateway/firewall for outgoing/incomming trafic to internet.. and that is
>the
>> same rules as the local users). Perhaps this will be slow.. but that would
>> be the same security level as sitting local right?
>>
>> If the remote users didnīt surf through the company line then the question
>> is:
>> What if the company use a Linksys router for surfing the net (localy)..and
>> the remote use their own Linksys also (to surf/VPN.. what is the
>difference
>> of security then?..they *all* have access to the LAN..
>>
>> --
>> Johan Tuneld
>>
>> Your Guide To Filetransfer Fix for ICQ 2001/2002
>> And a complete guide of Gateway / Firewall configuration for all ICQ
>clients
>> http://www.tuneld.com
>>
>>
>
>To provide the same level of security as if you were surfing from the
>company LAN, yes, you would need to have the browser traffic go through the
>VPN to the Internet via the company firewall and return back the other way
>... performance would suffer. Typically this is not the way it works.
>
>If the remote user had their own router/firewall then, yes, security is
>increased but how responsible is the remote user going to be? Do they
>really know how to configure and then check that the router/firewall is
>secure? Plus we're only talking about packet filtering firewalls here. Not
>quite the same league as a full statefull application inspection firewall.
>I realise it's horses for courses but the security of the office is only as
>strong as the weakest link. I know what would give me the most doubt.
>
>As a network administrator I would be reluctant to provide VPN access to a
>remote client unless they agree to abide by certain security policies.
>After all, who must accept overall responsibility? How can an end user be
>held responsible when they don't know what VPN stands for let alone how it
>works?
>
>Lockdown the PC while the VPN is active ... better safe than sorry.
>
>BernieM
That is a good point. I would increase my security if I used a
stateful packet inspection device at the remote location also? Maybe
I should reconsider using the Linksys and go with a different firewall
product for the remote locations.
It looks like I am going to go with a SnapGear for the main office
location.
Thanks for everybody's insight and help.
Jeff
-- Jeff Grossman (jeff@stikman.com)
- Next message: : "Re: net send"
- Previous message: John Elsbury: "Re: Do I need a firewall?"
- In reply to: Bernie M: "Re: VPN Question"
- Next in thread: Mesomorf: "Re: VPN Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|