iptable vs cisco pix ???
From: Linux Newbie (bentan74@singnet.com.sg)Date: 10/10/02
- Next message: Leonid Rosenboim: "Re: Backgroun dnoise"
- Previous message: Cedric Blancher: "Re: Question on tunnelling"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: iptable vs cisco pix ???"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: iptable vs cisco pix ???"
- Reply: Oliver: "Re: iptable vs cisco pix ???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Linux Newbie" <bentan74@singnet.com.sg> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:46:58 +0800
hi,
apart from the initial startup cost, I would like to know if it's better
to have linux box for firewall than having cisco pix for a small company?
The cost is the main concern.
cheers
- Next message: Leonid Rosenboim: "Re: Backgroun dnoise"
- Previous message: Cedric Blancher: "Re: Question on tunnelling"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: iptable vs cisco pix ???"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: iptable vs cisco pix ???"
- Reply: Oliver: "Re: iptable vs cisco pix ???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|