Re: online diallers
From: mhicaoidh (mhic_aoidh@hotmail.NïX.com.SPäM)Date: 10/09/02
- Next message: DeadEyeJedi: "NAT Authentication Question?"
- Previous message: mhicaoidh: "Re: Firewalling after being hacked"
- In reply to: Tracker: "Re: online diallers"
- Next in thread: Tore Lund: "Re: online diallers and auto install exe files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "mhicaoidh" <mhic_aoidh@hotmail.NïX.com.SPäM> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 17:08:56 GMT
Taking a moment's reflection, Tracker mused:
|
| They have the same meaning to me, but some malicious hackers address them
| both in their own expression.
Then why be so daft as to continuously write "hacked/owned" when you
intend them to mean the same thing? Just say "hacked." Duh!
| Don't deal with the hacker who only whats to learn how hosts and servers
| function.
So, hackers are okay when they are learning ... they only become
malicious when they actually use that knowledge? That's a bit like saying,
mobsters aren't bad men until they become made men. Nice logic.
| To annoy the malicious hackers who might want to track my movements.
You don't think they can just do a Google search and track your posts?
What could they possibly glean from reading your drivel in Usenet other than
a good laugh?
| Only 20 entries, that's all. Talk to the ferret owners, they think my
| activity is 150 emails by now. Take what you read on Usenet with a grain
| of salt if you know what this means.
Oh, I know what it means ... I've given that advice to people who read
your drivel many times.
- Next message: DeadEyeJedi: "NAT Authentication Question?"
- Previous message: mhicaoidh: "Re: Firewalling after being hacked"
- In reply to: Tracker: "Re: online diallers"
- Next in thread: Tore Lund: "Re: online diallers and auto install exe files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]