Near and far dmz (is this model secure)
From: Christiaan Ehlers (chrisehlers_uk@yahoo.co.uk)Date: 10/04/02
- Next message: flex: "Re: Can someone help me with NetIQ ?"
- Previous message: : "Re: time offset"
- Next in thread: Leonid Rosenboim: "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Reply: Leonid Rosenboim: "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Reply: : "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Reply: Useko Netsumi: "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Reply: : "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Christiaan Ehlers" <chrisehlers_uk@yahoo.co.uk> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:30:13 +0100
We have to secure our nework, where we have an mail gateway (accepting
connections from the outside) which forwards it to exchange servers. Now I
believe in a strict DMZ policy where there is NO connections from the
outside or DMZ into the internal network.
My manager disagrees because he says that he wants the exchange in the
internal network and does not trust it on the DMZ (i can see his side of it
sine the whole companys mail is on the exchange server)
He proposed a scheme using a near and far DMZ. Basicaly the far-dmz allows
traffic from the internet, near-dmz and internal network. The near-dmz
allows connections from only the far-dmz and internal network. The internal
network would ultimately only allow limited connections from the near-dmz.
The last point I dont agree with I believe that the internal network should
not allow ANY incomming connections... Am I being to paranoid? Is this
model a trusted way of doing things? Is there a way that the top descibed
exchange setup can be made secure?
They are also planning extra server like rass server that might need access
to the internal network, I guess it is better having stuff like this sit on
a near dmz than on the internal network
any comments sugestions will help
regards
christiaan ehlers
- Next message: flex: "Re: Can someone help me with NetIQ ?"
- Previous message: : "Re: time offset"
- Next in thread: Leonid Rosenboim: "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Reply: Leonid Rosenboim: "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Reply: : "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Reply: Useko Netsumi: "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Reply: : "Re: Near and far dmz (is this model secure)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|