Re: The Beginning Of The End For Micro$oft Reign Of Terror
From: 0§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí (abuse@anarchy.gov)Date: 06/26/02
- Next message: Leythos: "Re: Watchguard Question"
- Previous message: Tom: "DB2 and DMZ Scenarios"
- In reply to: Gerry Quinn: "Re: The Beginning Of The End For Micro$oft Reign Of Terror"
- Next in thread: Gerry Quinn: "Re: The Beginning Of The End For Micro$oft Reign Of Terror"
- Reply: Gerry Quinn: "Re: The Beginning Of The End For Micro$oft Reign Of Terror"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: 0§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí <abuse@anarchy.gov> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 05:49:42 -0400
gerryq@indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn) said:
>In article <6ihdhu0i5mnkbiedgjanflfv741kvjar0u@4ax.com>, Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service wrote:
>
>>Like I said, there is absolutely nothing you can say to prove that the
>>registry is actually more efficient or beneficial than other systems.
>>It was purely a marketing decision, and a bad one for the consumer.
>
>I didn't try to prove it. I just explained its purpose to somebody
>seemingly ignorant of what the registry is for.
I know what the registry is for. It's to allow M$ to control the
desktop.
- Next message: Leythos: "Re: Watchguard Question"
- Previous message: Tom: "DB2 and DMZ Scenarios"
- In reply to: Gerry Quinn: "Re: The Beginning Of The End For Micro$oft Reign Of Terror"
- Next in thread: Gerry Quinn: "Re: The Beginning Of The End For Micro$oft Reign Of Terror"
- Reply: Gerry Quinn: "Re: The Beginning Of The End For Micro$oft Reign Of Terror"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
