Re: which firewall
From: Peter Larsen (plarsen@mail.tele.dk)Date: 05/27/02
- Next message: Charles Newman: "Re: content filter how to?"
- Previous message: D. Rasmussen: "Please help with ZA Pro and XP Pro"
- In reply to: chris@nospam.com: "Re: which firewall"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: which firewall"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: which firewall"
- Reply: chris@nospam.com: "Re: which firewall"
- Reply: Jens Hoffmann: "Re: which firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 08:28:44 +0200 From: Peter Larsen <plarsen@mail.tele.dk>
chris@nospam.com wrote:
> Big problem everyone here is missing is that a firewall is
> useless to protect IIS.
Which is why I suggested putting it on the inside of the webserver! -
but perhaps it was too subtle to skip explaining why.
> You have to let requests through to port 80 right?
> Recall that a large majority of the IIS attacks are specially
> malformed get requests.
>
> -Chris
--
*************************************************************
* This posting handcrafted by Peter Larsen, MCSE *
* My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk *
* I subscribe to http://www.spamcop.net *
*************************************************************
- Next message: Charles Newman: "Re: content filter how to?"
- Previous message: D. Rasmussen: "Please help with ZA Pro and XP Pro"
- In reply to: chris@nospam.com: "Re: which firewall"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: which firewall"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: which firewall"
- Reply: chris@nospam.com: "Re: which firewall"
- Reply: Jens Hoffmann: "Re: which firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
