Re: remote access getting round a firewall.
From: Leythos (void@nowhere.com)Date: 05/26/02
- Next message: Jerry Leslie: "Re: which firewall"
- Previous message: Leythos: "Re: WatchGuard Lies?"
- In reply to: Rob: "remote access getting round a firewall."
- Next in thread: Charles Newman: "Re: remote access getting round a firewall."
- Reply: Charles Newman: "Re: remote access getting round a firewall."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Leythos <void@nowhere.com> Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 22:09:26 GMT
In article <%3NH8.7885$Of.87109690@news-text.cableinet.net>,
rob.ellison@bigfoot.com says...
> hi i was wondering if anyone knows of a remote access program that is either
> stand alone (like VNC) or web based (like MS terminal services activeX
> client) that can be used over standard ports, like port 80 or 8080 or
> something like that to get round a firewall.
> basicly i want to access my pc at home, but a firewall is in the way that
> only lets connections to standard ports out - this may be down to ftp and
> http ports only now.
> as i dont have adminastrative privilages on this remote computer, i need the
> solution to not need installing.
> MS terminal services web client would be perfect but you cannot change the
> port it connects on.
> any comments would be very usefull
> thanks,
Rob, it sure sounds like you are violating your corporate network
policy. If the open ports 80 and 443, then they only want you browsing
the internet for work purposes - and connecting to your home system has
nothing to do with WORK.
In my wan, I would easily detect that you are connecting to a NON-
COMPANY based IP (meaning something like comcast or RR) and hunt you
down and terminate your connection - then turn your logs over to your
department head and let him deal with you.
I know, you think this is harsh, but consider how much time you waste at
work that your employer is paying for. Get a clue, work at work.
Harsh I know, but if you can't install anything and the down allow
connections outbound, then you should not be trying to subvert the
intent.
Mark
-- -- Leythos999@columbus.rr.com (Remove 999 to reply to me)
- Next message: Jerry Leslie: "Re: which firewall"
- Previous message: Leythos: "Re: WatchGuard Lies?"
- In reply to: Rob: "remote access getting round a firewall."
- Next in thread: Charles Newman: "Re: remote access getting round a firewall."
- Reply: Charles Newman: "Re: remote access getting round a firewall."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|