Re: pix firewall ports
From: Derek Zoolander (turbo6@grandnational.com)Date: 05/09/02
- Next message: Daniel Crichton: "Re: zone alarm & instant messanger"
- Previous message: Dave G: "Zoneralarm alerts"
- In reply to: Michael Sherman: "Re: pix firewall ports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Derek Zoolander" <turbo6@grandnational.com> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 13:29:23 GMT
Thanks, Michael. I didn't know about invisible rule once an access-list is
created. That certainly makes things easier. :)
"Michael Sherman" <m-sherman.spam@cox.net> wrote in message
news:qtnjduk9h3r4iiqfdiqa7kel3mpueuqbpf@4ax.com...
> With PIX - if no access-lists are in place it is wide open. Once you
> put in one access list there is an invisible explicit deny rule. So,
> all you would do is create and access-list allowing http and smpt and
> thats it...everything else will be blocked.
>
> On Thu, 09 May 2002 00:11:32 GMT, "Derek Zoolander"
> <turbo6@grandnational.com> wrote:
>
> >What is the easiest way to close all ports except 80 and 25 outgoing on a
> >Cisco Pix firewall? Is it through access-lists?
> >
>
>
>
> m-sherman-spam@cox.net
> --------------------------
> Remove the -spam for email
- Next message: Daniel Crichton: "Re: zone alarm & instant messanger"
- Previous message: Dave G: "Zoneralarm alerts"
- In reply to: Michael Sherman: "Re: pix firewall ports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|