Re: Stealth is good?
From: \ (dvader@deathstar.mil)Date: 05/03/02
- Next message: 4444: "Re: Decent Firewall"
- Previous message: Seppo Korhonen: "Re: blocking "porn dialers""
- In reply to: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Stealth is good?"
- Next in thread: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Stealth is good?"
- Reply: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Stealth is good?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "\"Crash\" Dummy" <dvader@deathstar.mil> Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:10:35 -0400
>Nonsense.
Which part is nonsense? The "warm, fuzzy feeling," the "violates TCP/IP
protocol," or "bogs down the system?"
>As any properly configured firewall will demonstrate.
How do you properly configure a firewall that does not reply to requests?
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy Certified Dilettante Dave@gpick.com http://lists.gpick.com
- Next message: 4444: "Re: Decent Firewall"
- Previous message: Seppo Korhonen: "Re: blocking "porn dialers""
- In reply to: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Stealth is good?"
- Next in thread: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Stealth is good?"
- Reply: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Stealth is good?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
