IMO
From: me (iwantareallylongemailaddress@optushome.com.au)Date: 04/29/02
- Next message: Eirik Seim: "Re: ipf rules verification please"
- Previous message: Berk S. Daemon: "Re: Windows XP Firewall Dropped Packets"
- Next in thread: Eirik Seim: "Re: IMO"
- Reply: Eirik Seim: "Re: IMO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:12:48 +1000 From: me <iwantareallylongemailaddress@optushome.com.au>
After spending the better part of two hours reading the posts of this ng dating back only as far as 27/02/2002, I must
say that the information offered is not bad. Im glad to see that the user "Tracker" has not responded lately.
A word of advise for some. Dont offer advise that could hold you liable. Changes in the world security arena has already
offer two companies legal rights to sue an individual directly related to information offered in a ng.
In reality, a firewall is only as good as the rule set. Unfortunately, most people dont understand that port 520 is one
of the unsung heroes of current problems.
Good hunting and enjoy the openness of the net.
- Next message: Eirik Seim: "Re: ipf rules verification please"
- Previous message: Berk S. Daemon: "Re: Windows XP Firewall Dropped Packets"
- Next in thread: Eirik Seim: "Re: IMO"
- Reply: Eirik Seim: "Re: IMO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|