Re: IRC slowness and firewall
From: amputee (dirty@pakistani.com)Date: 04/21/02
- Next message: Geld Netherling: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro 3.0 VS. Norton Internet Security 2002"
- Previous message: Thor Kottelin: "Re: IRC slowness and firewall"
- In reply to:(deleted message) El Brujo: "IRC slowness and firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "amputee" <dirty@pakistani.com> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:24:45 GMT
"El Brujo" <me@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:bgt5cukf6n1j58q506f9c2eoj4srtev2f5@4ax.com...
>
> I'm using Kerio and I noticed that when the firewall is active, mIRC
> takes a lot of time to connect to the irc server, but it connects
> almost instantaneously when Kerio is off. I have a simple rule to
> allow mIRC to connect to any IP at port 6667 (IRC standard) through
> TCP, so what's the problem?
>
> Anyone can help?
>
> TIA
This is probably because most IRC servers authenticate by connecting
to your host on port 113 (identd/authentication) if Kerio is running,
this port is blocked, and no ident response is returned. Also, and I'm
taking a guess here, Kerio probably silently drops SYNs, some
firewall manufacturers call this "stealth" mode or something similar.
Normally when your machine receives a SYN and the port is closed,
a RST is sent, but in this mode, nothing will be sent, so the server will
wait a default amount of time for the packet to time out.
- Next message: Geld Netherling: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro 3.0 VS. Norton Internet Security 2002"
- Previous message: Thor Kottelin: "Re: IRC slowness and firewall"
- In reply to:(deleted message) El Brujo: "IRC slowness and firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|