Re: choosing personal firewall ?
From: dave @ stejonda (@)Date: 04/19/02
- Next message: Gavin Watkinson: "Re: ADV: New firewall"
- Previous message: Chris: "Re: What is this traffic??"
- In reply to: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: choosing personal firewall ?"
- Next in thread: keezdriver: "Re: choosing personal firewall ?"
- Reply: keezdriver: "Re: choosing personal firewall ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "dave @ stejonda" <usenet_from@stejonda.freeuk.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 09:33:53 +0100
In message <a9md7q$tv1$2@news.shlink.de>, Wolfgang Kueter
<wolfgang@shconnect.de> writes
>Emanuele Blanco wrote:
>
>> I need to install a Personal Firewall
>
>You don't.
I've got two w98se m/c's connected via a BEFSR41 router/switch. I'd been
running Atguard on both m/cs since before I got the router and left it
in place since installing it. I've now substituted Outpost on one m/c
(in view of recent thread here about Atguard getting to be a bit dated).
Outpost has 'attack detection' which Atguard doesn't and it reports
around 6 'connection requests' (Ok, that's not very many :) from various
IP's each 24 hours. Could someone explain why, when I'm running the
router with no port-forwarding, do 'connection requests' get as far as
the Outpost firewall?
-- dave @ stejonda
- Next message: Gavin Watkinson: "Re: ADV: New firewall"
- Previous message: Chris: "Re: What is this traffic??"
- In reply to: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: choosing personal firewall ?"
- Next in thread: keezdriver: "Re: choosing personal firewall ?"
- Reply: keezdriver: "Re: choosing personal firewall ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|