Re: Making a box disappear
From: misase_kim (mkim@none.de)Date: 04/10/02
- Next message: misase_kim: "Re: Online/offline alert not understood"
- Previous message: Wade Hampton: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro 3.0 is a piece of crap!!!!"
- In reply to: nihil: "Making a box disappear"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: misase_kim <mkim@none.de> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 22:02:28 GMT
If you are only serving ftp then what bout binding to a another obscure
port. And a drop will give a host not found.
nihil wrote:
> I have a semi-theoretical question I was hoping to discuss.
>
> I have a fairly common setup, cable modem inbound to a linux 2.4.x box
> with a local lan. The linux box serves out SSH, ftp, imap, smtp, and
> http connections, though none of them are designed to be public. (in
> case anyone tracks me down, they are used for remote access, which is
> fair under my AUP)
>
> In most cases I do not want to filter so stringently that I cannot
> touch the box from wherever I want. And I still want to be able to
> allow selected people 1-time download access via ftp (through a nice
> chrooted ftp account). However, I prefer to stay off everyone's
> radar.
>
> Plus, I'm curious if I can do this. Here is the idea (somewhat stolen
> from other postings I've seen here):
>
> When you open a shoebox, if its empty, you expect to see the bottom of
> a shoebox. If you open it and see a black hole of nothingness, you
> know something is up.
>
> So, when someone scans me, or hits a service from a box I decided I
> didnt like, instead of doing a DROP on iptables, I want to do a
> REJECT. Then presumably, on the way out, I would like to SNAT it to
> my ISP's router, turning it from a "Port Unavailable" (Host alive, but
> rejected) to a "Host Unavailable" (Host not found)
>
> I'm still doing the research to pull it off, but I was curious if
> anyone has ever tried (or succeeded in) doing this. Or if you think
> it will break things.
>
> Which it might. A scan of the box (while portsentry is off) would
> return a bunch of "Host Unavailable" responses next to some valid
> services. I dont see any problems right now, but together with some
> nice packet flag/conntrack rules, I should be able to completely
> disappear from nmap et al.
>
- Next message: misase_kim: "Re: Online/offline alert not understood"
- Previous message: Wade Hampton: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro 3.0 is a piece of crap!!!!"
- In reply to: nihil: "Making a box disappear"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|