Re: Allow Passive move ftp
From: Berk S. Daemon (someone@somewhere.com)Date: 04/02/02
- Next message: Robert Young: "TrueVector puzzle with ZA Pro3 upgrade attempt"
- Previous message: Paul: "Re: AtGuard, ShieldsUp & Implicit Blocking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Berk S. Daemon" <someone@somewhere.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 20:03:34 GMT
"Edmund " <limed13@singnet.com.sg> wrote in message
news:a86j0k$fr2$1@violet.singnet.com.sg...
> I have been trying to allow my internal network from accessing ftp
services
> (passive) however there is no
> way i am able to allow that...as allowing all packets to go through that
has
> a random source of high port no. would mean a security loop hole...
>
> currently i only allow packets originating from port 20 or port 21 to go
> through my firewall...
>
> is there a way out of this???
>
> I am using IPTables in Linux 7.2
>
> thanks all
No such thing as 'Linux 7.2'. They're only at Linux 2.4...
If you're talking about a Linux distro, such as RootHat or Mandork Linux
then IPTables has nothing to do with them either.
As it stands, there are about 189 or more fragmented & unstandard Linux
distro's so guessing what you mean my 7.2 is a shot in the dark. :-/
www.openbsd.org
- Next message: Robert Young: "TrueVector puzzle with ZA Pro3 upgrade attempt"
- Previous message: Paul: "Re: AtGuard, ShieldsUp & Implicit Blocking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|