Re: Software Firewalls Question
From: Tracker (TheTrackers@attbi.com)Date: 03/22/02
- Next message: Don Kelloway: "Re: What is usualy on 113 port?"
- Previous message: Tracker: "Re: Software Firewalls Question"
- In reply to: Swingman: "Re: Software Firewalls Question"
- Next in thread: Tracker: "Re: Software Firewalls Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Tracker <TheTrackers@attbi.com> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 06:09:57 GMT
I disagree with you. I installed Nortons Firewall with no configuration
on my part and the hackers got back into my system. Read my recent
post.
Tracker
Swingman wrote:
>
> It depends on how you define "protect". You will be more protected running
> a software firewall then not running it IMHO. Whether or not it's enough
> depends on the threat.
>
> "Jim" <RetroNet@Gothicbtinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:a7dmd2$grf$1@helle.btinternet.com...
> > I have just been told by a Technical Expert that Software Firewalls are a
> > waste of time and will not protect me online. Is this correct
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Jim
> > Outgoing Mail Scanned By NAV 2002
> > Please remove Gothic if replying by email
> > RetroNet@Gothicbtinternet.com
> > Necroflash@hotmail.com
> >
> >
> >
- Next message: Don Kelloway: "Re: What is usualy on 113 port?"
- Previous message: Tracker: "Re: Software Firewalls Question"
- In reply to: Swingman: "Re: Software Firewalls Question"
- Next in thread: Tracker: "Re: Software Firewalls Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|