Re: PORT 135 still open with Norton PF 2002
From: \ (dvader@deathstar.mil)Date: 03/18/02
- Next message: Frederick: "What is this? An attempted hack?"
- Previous message: \: "Re: Port 135"
- In reply to: John: "Re: PORT 135 still open with Norton PF 2002"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "\"Crash\" Dummy" <dvader@deathstar.mil> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:39:41 -0500
>The culprit is the Default Inbound
>Loopback rule which looks like it permits connections from other computers
>such as web servers using TCP and UDP protocols. I am not very savvy with
>the use of firewalls, and I'm concerned about fouling up my system. This
>rule must be there for a reason, how can I modify it to beef up my firewall
>without screwing other things up?
Set the local address to "localhost" instead of "any." I use AtGuard, which
is what a good firewall looks like before Symantec gets a hold of it. It
formed the original kernel for Norton Personal Firewall. Below are the
Loopback rules that I use. Note the Local Address setting for "Inbound" and
Remote Address setting for "Outbound."
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy Certified Dilettante Dave@gpick.com http://lists.gpick.com------------------------------------------------------ Rule 3 Default Inbound Loopback Rule in use: YES Logging: NO Protocol: TCP or UDP Action: Permit Direction: Inbound Application: Any Application Local service: Any Service Local Address: (localhost) ......HostName: localhost ............IP: 127.0.0.1 Remote service: Any Service Remote Address: Any Address ------------------------------------------------------ Rule 4 Default Outbound Loopback Rule in use: YES Logging: NO Protocol: TCP or UDP Action: Permit Direction: Outbound Application: Any Application Local service: Any Service Local Address: Any Address Remote service: Any Service Remote Address: (localhost) ......HostName: localhost ............IP: 127.0.0.1 ------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Frederick: "What is this? An attempted hack?"
- Previous message: \: "Re: Port 135"
- In reply to: John: "Re: PORT 135 still open with Norton PF 2002"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|