Re: Firewall for Static IP Addresses
From: Bill Somerville (bsomerville@toad.net)Date: 03/08/02
- Next message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: NAT vs. True Firewalls"
- Previous message: Lance Cuthbert: "Re: Symantec Enterprise Firewall 7.0"
- In reply to: Peter Blundell: "Firewall for Static IP Addresses"
- Next in thread: Lefty: "Re: Firewall for Static IP Addresses"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Bill Somerville" <bsomerville@toad.net> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 22:13:42 -0500
Sort of depends on what you want and are willing to spend. There are
probably lots of options here, but I'm using a SonicWALL SOHO2 to do
essentially the same thing. I have four static IP addresses, firewalled
using SonicWALL's one-to-one NAT. I doubt that there are many choices on
the software side, but I haven't really looked for this kind of option in
software, as I wanted an appliance firewall. The SOHO3 (newer model than
mine) currently goes for < $400 on buy.com. Well worth the money. That's
for 10 clients (or servers), BTW. The SOHO3/50 is about $900.
-- Bill
"Peter Blundell" <peter.blundellnospam@computerservices.co.uk> wrote in
message news:82426d93.0203070838.5334fe7d@posting.google.com...
> We have recently been allocated 3 static IP addresses on our permanent
> internet line from our ISP - which they have nat'ed to 3 servers on
> our internal network.
>
> For clarification lets say that the three servers we can access this
> way have real addresses of 192.168.1.1 thru 192.168.1.3.
>
> The router supplied by the ISP had "our" side of it set as
> 192.168.1.160
>
> All of this works fine - but I do not know how to tackle the security
> side of it.
>
> I had thought of using Winroute, but I thought that this would only
> work if "our" side of the ISP's router was on a different network
> (perhaps 192.168.2.xxx) and then the Winroute PC was routing between
> the two 192.168 networks internally. Our ISP can provide security
> through the router but this is not convenient since we have to email
> changes to them and then wait for days for them to happen.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you
>
> Peter Blundell
- Next message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: NAT vs. True Firewalls"
- Previous message: Lance Cuthbert: "Re: Symantec Enterprise Firewall 7.0"
- In reply to: Peter Blundell: "Firewall for Static IP Addresses"
- Next in thread: Lefty: "Re: Firewall for Static IP Addresses"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|