Re: WatchGuard Technologies
From: Sekurity Wizard \(Ralph\) ("Sekurity@info.der-keiler.de)Date: 03/02/02
- Next message: Sekurity Wizard \(Ralph\): "Re: IPSec and Sonicwall"
- Previous message: Jabberwocky: "Re: SmoothWall Patches ALERT!"
- In reply to: Boy: "WatchGuard Technologies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Sekurity Wizard \(Ralph\)" <rlos at enteredge dot com> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 18:01:12 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yep, one main comment: Don't do it. If you really are having money
issues - do something with freeware on LINUX..but if you want a
statefule, well-rounded fireawll, go with NetScreen, or a CheckPoint
if you can score the cash...better still is going CyberGuard.
Cheers!
- --
- -_-+< -- rL >+-_-
.>.>.>../ The Sekurity Wizard
- --0--0
"Boy" <why@me.com> wrote in message
news:8quv7u0nf8c6107u87oh4v4lb42evcqqbq@4ax.com...
: I'm thinking about the WatchGuard Firebox 700...any comments ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.1.1
iQA/AwUBPIAINtfQPveTWZDtEQKUIwCgsoamyB0rcUZeMwOPwFUE3jji3JwAoPyZ
Zx91b1e8uFa3MYtsSribF6VI
=Omzn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: Sekurity Wizard \(Ralph\): "Re: IPSec and Sonicwall"
- Previous message: Jabberwocky: "Re: SmoothWall Patches ALERT!"
- In reply to: Boy: "WatchGuard Technologies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|