Re: webcams behind firewalls
From: ITC(SW) Scott Smith (richard-smith@hawaii.rr.com)Date: 02/25/02
- Previous message: Charles Johnston: "Re: ZA Blocks my own news-server???"
- In reply to: Eye of the Storm: "Re: webcams behind firewalls"
- Next in thread: Eye of the Storm: "Re: webcams behind firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "ITC(SW) Scott Smith" <richard-smith@hawaii.rr.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:22:11 GMT
Eye of the Storm wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 01:15:59 GMT, "ITC(SW) Scott Smith"
> <richard-smith@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>>For netmeeting, you need to set your router up to allow ports 1720,
>>1503, 1731, 522, and 389 to the IP of the computer you are using for
>>netmeeting. This will allow video and making calls via the ILS servers
>>etc...Not sure what SMC menu allows you to do this but is commonly known
>>as "port forwarding". Neetmeeting faqs all over have this information
>>and can provide specific port details, i.e., what they are for...
>>
>
> I tried all of these ports with Netmeeting and it never did work. The
> software still uses some ports dynamically, so you have to open all
> ports for it to function. Even then, NAT screws it up. The NAT
> traversing function of UPnP is required and none of the hardware
> router/firewalls support that.
>
> I did get it working in one direction - as long as one system is not
> behind a firewall you can dial-up that system. But that system still
> can't dial you.
>
> I haven't yet tried with the latest Microsoft Messenger, but to the
> best of my knowledge it still works via the H.323 which dynamically
> assigns ports.
>
aye, opening up or allowing inbound udp's 1024-65k on a firewall is
neccessary. We don't allow it in my org to cross FW boundaries yet.. New
proxy schemes are in the works but nothing yet.
I am using a netgear rt314 and have just opened up the TCP ports using
the rt's port forwarding feature to my 192.168.x.x address of the
machine I normally use.. (NAT) Since it is connected 90%, the DHCP on
the netgear doesn't change the address. Of course if it did, I would
have to reconfigure the port forwarding feature. Not sure if SMC will do
this in the same manner. I use netmeeting frequently without any
related problems. Both via ILS and direct calling .
Will have to do a little more research on how the rt314 handles
requested incoming udp packets above 1024. I know the rt is dropping
packets (or firewalling) to a certain extent (like a normal router). I
Keep snort running on my linux box looking at my 192.168.x.x/24 and
never see the zillions of port scans that you would normally see
directly connected to the net via dsl/cable modem. Keep blackice on my
w2k machines with same result.
Didn't initially research it. Configured the rt314 and it worked. I then
went on to the next project. :-) Now I'm curious. Gonna hafta take a
closer look.
R/Scott
- Next message: Ian Pollard: "Re: ZA doens't seem to work with XP and IE"
- Previous message: Charles Johnston: "Re: ZA Blocks my own news-server???"
- In reply to: Eye of the Storm: "Re: webcams behind firewalls"
- Next in thread: Eye of the Storm: "Re: webcams behind firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|