Re: iptables and port scan
From: Cedric Blancher (blancher@cartel-securite.fr)Date: 02/13/02
- Next message: Eirik Seim: "Re: How to Stealth POP3 Port 110 using NIS2000?"
- Previous message: Lutz Donnerhacke: "Re: PAT on PIX firewall"
- In reply to: Lutz Donnerhacke: "Re: iptables and port scan"
- Next in thread: Lutz Donnerhacke: "Re: iptables and port scan"
- Reply: Lutz Donnerhacke: "Re: iptables and port scan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Cedric Blancher <blancher@cartel-securite.fr> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:18:11 +0000 (UTC)
Dans sa prose, Lutz Donnerhacke (lutz@iks-jena.de) nous ecrivait :
> Do you know, that RFC say: "If no MX record can be found, use A"?
> How determine the service offers for 1234? How to determine the DNS offers
> on TCP/53? Is AXFR abnormal?
Once again, I explain my policy. My domain has a MX. No need to look for
SMTP elsewhere. I do not offer 1234 service, no need to check. My DNS is
registred and AXFR is only useful between servers that need to exchange
my zones. Are you running a DNS server that answers for my domains ? If
not, you do not need my zones.
> I'm the ISP. Does this qualify me to behave abnormal?
So you connect ROOT servers, which are known.
>>The only reference for the services I offer to anonymous user is my website.
>>My website is called www. Was it so difficult to find ?
> Where is it specified, that all allowed services must published in a machine-
> unreadable language embedded in HTML received via HTTP connects to port 80
> on the machine suffixed by "www."?
That's my policy. Till beginning, I expose my policy to explain you that
in such a case, you do not have to scan my hosts to reach services I
offer you, to make you admit that there are situations when dropping is
no harmful, and keeping into such fanatic positions (as fanatic as those
who claims portscanners should be prosecuted) is, to my mind, useless.
> DENY will harm you, your customers, your friends, and companies you deal with.
> I.e. ident is a common backquery.
No, because my customers, friends, and companies I deal with do not try
to connect to closed ports.
-- je pense pas que ce soit toi....tu es bien trop vicieux pour agir de cette façon. Toi ton genre, c'est plus de contacter banque direct en esperant que je n'auras pas mes cadeaux de parrainages!!!!! -+- JD in <http://neuneu.mine.nu> : Petit neuneu Noël -+-
- Next message: Eirik Seim: "Re: How to Stealth POP3 Port 110 using NIS2000?"
- Previous message: Lutz Donnerhacke: "Re: PAT on PIX firewall"
- In reply to: Lutz Donnerhacke: "Re: iptables and port scan"
- Next in thread: Lutz Donnerhacke: "Re: iptables and port scan"
- Reply: Lutz Donnerhacke: "Re: iptables and port scan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|