Re: Current config secure enough?

From: Joe Bloggs (stuSpam-art@excite.com)
Date: 02/06/02 

From: Joe Bloggs <stuSpam-art@excite.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 15:41:58 +0100

lol...

Take that as a yes.

"Keith W. McCammon" wrote:

> Probably, but it's all relative. It's secure enough for your home PC, but
> if you telecommute for the NSA, that's probably a bit slack. Ya dig?
>
> --
> Keith W. McCammon
>
> "JimM" <nomail@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.16cb004390ba22b69896c6@news.verizon.net...
> > I'm sure you get this all the time, but...
> >
> > This is my current config.
> > Internet
> > |
> > V
> > Linksys BEFSR41 (Deny WAN request enabled, no ports forwarded,
> > | PPPoE)
> > V
> > Astaro Firewall (No ports forwarded,
> > | hosting no internal services,
> > | Masquerading,
> > | Packet filters allow only services
> > | that I actually use)
> > |
> > V
> > Internal network (All have ZA installed)
> >
> > Secure enough to leave on all the time?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > JimM

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Back end not secured.
    ... > Hi Keith, ... I opened my secure front end, ... > backend. ... Can you explain how your process applies the security to the new ...
    (microsoft.public.access.security)
  • Re: CodeRed filtering (Solved !!)
    ... Where can one find that conf file, ... >>> Have you tried adding this rule below your stealth rule? ... >>> Keith W. McCammon ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Tool to report disabled users
    ... "Keith W. McCammon" wrote in message ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: Password not working
    ... > It is noted that this type of password protection is not very secure so I ... HTH - Keith. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.access.security)
  • Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer
    ... Keith W. McCammon wrote: ... >It would be nice if the clowns at @stake responsible for this would ... Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html ...
    (Full-Disclosure)