Re: Why TPF now that we have Outpost? (was: tpf and outpost)
From: Lee Higdon (leehigdon3@attbi.com)Date: 01/31/02
- Next message: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: NAT vs. True Firewalls"
- Previous message: Lee Higdon: "Re: Sygate Firewall"
- In reply to: Jules Dubois: "Re: Why TPF now that we have Outpost? (was: tpf and outpost)"
- Next in thread: Yoyo: "Re: tpf and outpost"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Lee Higdon" <leehigdon3@attbi.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:53:07 GMT
"Jules Dubois" <usenet+julesd@erols.com.invalid-tld> wrote in message
news:sn1h5u809l5vdc81pf3nskl7ocscprmrjd@4ax.com...
> Is there any firewall with is both useful and safe when used by "the
> typical 'clueless' PC user"?
Sygate PFW
-- Peace,Lee Higdon
- Next message: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: NAT vs. True Firewalls"
- Previous message: Lee Higdon: "Re: Sygate Firewall"
- In reply to: Jules Dubois: "Re: Why TPF now that we have Outpost? (was: tpf and outpost)"
- Next in thread: Yoyo: "Re: tpf and outpost"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
