Re: CheckPoint 4.1 vs. NG
From: Wayne McGlinn (wayne.mcglinn@didata.com.au)Date: 01/31/02
- Next message: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: How can a guy get ahold of the docs for CP FW-1 NG?"
- Previous message: D. Cameron Mauch: "How can a guy get ahold of the docs for CP FW-1 NG?"
- In reply to: Cap: "CheckPoint 4.1 vs. NG"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Wayne McGlinn" <wayne.mcglinn@didata.com.au> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:58:52 +1000
"Cap" <chc_landlord@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9cf42334.0201301601.4402148f@posting.google.com...
> WE've got a consulting firm coming to install a new Nokia. We just
> realized they were planning on putting 4.1 on, instead of NG.
>
> Is there any reason to not go with NG? They hemmed and hawed about
> how it was new, and not tested, and there'd be issues, blah blah blah.
> I think they're blowing smoke up our ****
>
> It seems to me NG would be a better choice, but perhaps there are
> issues with it... anybody experiencing any "issues" with NG?
>
> thanks
>
> Mark
Go with NG FP1, its just been released for Nokia.
Wayne McGlinn
Brisbane, Oz
- Next message: Wayne McGlinn: "Re: How can a guy get ahold of the docs for CP FW-1 NG?"
- Previous message: D. Cameron Mauch: "How can a guy get ahold of the docs for CP FW-1 NG?"
- In reply to: Cap: "CheckPoint 4.1 vs. NG"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
