Re: tpf and outpost

From: Yoyo (pig@netzero.NOSPAMnet)
Date: 01/30/02 

From: pig@netzero.NOSPAMnet (Yoyo)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:25:07 GMT

On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:49:20 +0100, Tore Lund <tl001@online.no> wrote:

>Yoyo wrote:
>>
>> Can these two firewalls run together?
>
>Whatever the answer, is there any reason to run both? Does TPF offer
>anything not found in Outpost Free?

I use outpost pro--liked it enough to buy it--I am spoiled by the
plug-ins--there's still some bugs though. They have yet to fix the
attachment filter. But once they get version 1 out I think these
problems will be fixed. I askd about tpf because I was having a
problem with a certain application. Since then, I updated OP and it
fixed it.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: TPF loyalists
    ... TPF, ... be no real reason to move to Kerio's version anyway - especially since ... are loyalists sticking with TPF or moving onto KPF??? ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: tpf and outpost
    ... Yoyo wrote: ... > Can these two firewalls run together? ... is there any reason to run both? ... Does TPF offer ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Pre Orders are now being taken for Medieval Madness from March 1st
    ... If TPF actually produces the 1000 games there would no reason to stop ... worth now? ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: Tiny Personal Firewall - which version?
    ... It wasn't TPF. ... of these "personal" firewalls provide that feature. ... first to coin the term "stateful packet inspection" back in 1993 so it's ... common client application for their NIS, NAV, and NAS then you have a ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Tiny Personal Firewall - which version?
    ... It wasn't TPF. ... of these "personal" firewalls provide that feature. ... first to coin the term "stateful packet inspection" back in 1993 so it's ... common client application for their NIS, NAV, and NAS then you have a ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
Loading