Re: iptables and netmeeting
From: ACEAlex (alex@saers.com)Date: 01/24/02
- Next message: Dr. Bob: "Re: Proxomitron not working...need help"
- Previous message: bryon lejeune: "Packet Sniffing and Virus help"
- In reply to: ACEAlex: "Re: iptables and netmeeting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "ACEAlex" <alex@saers.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:34:13 +0100
Ahha, got it to work with the cvs version :)
"ACEAlex" <alex@saers.com> wrote in message news:a2po2d$5st$1@news.lth.se...
> oki i got some new problems with the patch
>
> After scouting around the iptables1.2.5 dir I think i understand how to do
> things.
>
> Just some info, i have a newly downloaded kernel. 2.4.17
>
> Running ./runme newnat in patch-omatic dir i get this
>
> <snip>
> Welcome to Rusty's Patch-o-matic!
>
> Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not.
> Almost every one has bugs, so I don't recommend applying them all!
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Already applied: submitted/2.4.4
> submitted/TOS-oops-fix
> submitted/ip6t_mac-fix-ipv6
> submitted/ip6tables-export-symbols
> submitted/ip_nat_irc-srcaddr-fix
> submitted/ipchains-redirect-fix
> submitted/ipt_MIRROR-ttl
> submitted/ipt_REJECT-checkentry
> submitted/ipt_mac-fix
> submitted/ipt_unclean-ecn
> submitted/module-license
> submitted/netlink-tcpdiag
> submitted/sackperm
> submitted/skb_clone_copy
> submitted/tcp-MSS
>
> Testing... 0-newnat5.patch NOT APPLIED (54 rejects out of 56 hunks)
> The newnat/0-newnat5 patch:
> Author: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>,
> modified by Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
> Status: Pending for kernel inclusion
>
> Implementation of the new nat API.
>
> The whole newnat suite is dependent of it.
>
>
> Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/q/?] y
> Testing patch newnat/0-newnat5.patch...
> Failed to patch copy of /usr/src/linux
> TEST FAILED: patch NOT applied.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/q/?]
> </snip>
> Hmm, oki, is this patch not compatible with kernel 2.4.17 or am i doing
> something wrong?
>
> Hope to hear from you soon
> /Alexander
>
>
> "Cedric Blancher" <blancher@cartel-securite.fr> wrote in message
> news:slrna50im8.1g2.blancher@elendil.intranet.cartel-info.fr...
> > Dans sa prose, ACEAlex (alex@saers.com) nous ecrivait :
> > > I have a linux box that act lika a router to a adsl modem and a lan. I
> know
> > > that there currently are no support for netmeeting but i wounder if
you
> > > could portforward the ports that netmeeting uses to a single computer
on
> the
> > > net. So that atleast one computer could run netmeeting? Does anybody
> know
> > > how and witch ports that netmeeting uses?
> >
> > See http://ww.netfilter.org/
> >
> > H323 support (protocol used by Netmeeting) is in 1.2.4 and 1.2.5
> > patch-o-matic.
> >
> > See text files such as INSTALL or README like stiff in iptables archive
> > to build this stuff.
> >
> > --
> > BOFH excuse #405:
> >
> > Sysadmins unavailable because they are in a meeting talking about why
they
> > are unavailable so much.
>
>
- Next message: Dr. Bob: "Re: Proxomitron not working...need help"
- Previous message: bryon lejeune: "Packet Sniffing and Virus help"
- In reply to: ACEAlex: "Re: iptables and netmeeting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
