Re: Firewall vs. security!
From: Hilton Travis (htravis@mypants.gmx.net)Date: 01/14/02
- Next message: Patrick Lotti: "Re: CheckPoint FW-1 NG and "Port Forwarding""
- Previous message: Abe Abrahamian: "when I play FS2002 and windows XP pro"
- In reply to: olsen: "Firewall vs. security!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Hilton Travis" <htravis@mypants.gmx.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:46:51 +1000
In article <a1kt3p$19vh$1@news.cybercity.dk>, "olsen" <olsen@surfpost.dk>
wrote:
> I have a ISA server from microsoft installed, but i have lately
> questioned the security aspect of it?
>
> I have been thinking of running firewall-1 from checkpoint insted, wich
> of the two firewalls is best ??
Hi olsen,
ISA Server itself is quite a secure firewall, however it has to run on a
Microsoft operating system, and this is more than likely to be its
downfall. As well as keeping the Firewall (ISA) up-to-date, you have to
keep on top of the security aspects of an inherently insecure OS.
I would personally run a firewall that is *nix or *BSD based. These are
inherently MORE secure operating systems than anything Microsoft has
produced to date, and going on past/current performance, is likely to
produce in the future.
Regards,
HiltonT
- Next message: Patrick Lotti: "Re: CheckPoint FW-1 NG and "Port Forwarding""
- Previous message: Abe Abrahamian: "when I play FS2002 and windows XP pro"
- In reply to: olsen: "Firewall vs. security!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|