Re: A poor man's activity check :)
From: Juergen Nieveler (juergen.nieveler@web.de)Date: 01/10/02
- Next message: Curt Edsall: "Re: Mandrake Single Network Firewall 7.2"
- Previous message: hal@info.der-keiler.de: "Re: Should I let this one in?"
- In reply to: Bargepole: "Re: A poor man's activity check :)"
- Next in thread: Ken S.: "Re: A poor man's activity check :)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Juergen Nieveler <juergen.nieveler@web.de> Date: 10 Jan 2002 15:07:25 GMT
"Bargepole" <jbhur@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:bSh%7.212141$KT.51094473@news4.rdc1.on.home.com:
> In PORT mode, an FTP server connects from its TCP port 20 to the port
> specified in the PORT command from the FTP client. It doesn't connect
> to the client's TCP port 20.
Thanks for the correction ;-)
Of course, this means that the firewall on the client side will have to
check wether a connection from port 20 to >1024 really belongs to the
FTP connection...
-- Juergen Nieveler Support the ban of Dihydrogen Monoxide: http://www.dhmo.org/ "The people united can never be ignited!"- Sgt. Colon, Ankh-Morpork Watch http://bofh.gmxhome.de / juergen.nieveler@web.de / PGP Supported!
- Next message: Curt Edsall: "Re: Mandrake Single Network Firewall 7.2"
- Previous message: hal@info.der-keiler.de: "Re: Should I let this one in?"
- In reply to: Bargepole: "Re: A poor man's activity check :)"
- Next in thread: Ken S.: "Re: A poor man's activity check :)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
