Re: stateful inspection
From: Christian Altenbach (altenbach@mediaone.net.invalid)Date: 12/19/01
- Next message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Checkpoint FW-1 4.1 (AKA CP2000) service packs"
- Previous message: Mickey: "Re: BlackICE Misinformation"
- Maybe in reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: stateful inspection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Christian Altenbach" <altenbach@mediaone.net.invalid> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:28:13 GMT
"Erik Basilier" <ebasiliersprint0@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:9vp54q$7f4$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net...
> This question will make sense only for readers familiar with "stateful
> inspection"
> as used in Checkpoint Firewall-1.
...
> Does somebody have information
> about what reality is behind Netgear's "stateful inspection"?
>
The RO318 is based on the ZyNOS operating system by ZyXEL, which is probably
the best (stability, flexibility, features) in this market segment.
The RO318 uses a relatively simple ZyNOS stateful firewall implementation
compared to the much more full featured ZyWALL series:
http://www.zyxel.com/product/security/index.htm
If you want to get an idea about the stateful firewall implemented in the
ZyWALL 10, have a look at the manual at
ftp://ftp.zyxel.com/download/public/document/zywall10_v3.50_document_2_3.pdf
(300 pages!). Compare this with the 100 pages of the RO318 manual.
"Keith W. McCammon" <km@km.com> wrote in message
news:9vq82c$groha$1@ID-59806.news.dfncis.de...
> All that stateful inspection entails is the creation of a memory-resident
> table, and as SYN packets arrive, you add new connections to that table.
> Anything else that arrives with SYN/ACK, ACK, FIN, or RST must match an
> existing connection in the state table to be passed.
While Keith is partially right about keeping connection state, there is much
more to it. For example in many cases the packet payload is inspected (e.g.
SMPT traffic is scanned for SMTP commands considered safe and the connection
is dropped if anything else is tried). Certain dangerous Type/Code
combinations in ICMP are blocked. etc.etc.
Cheers
C.
- Next message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Checkpoint FW-1 4.1 (AKA CP2000) service packs"
- Previous message: Mickey: "Re: BlackICE Misinformation"
- Maybe in reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: stateful inspection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|