Re: Which is better Zonealarm or Tiny Personal?
From: Dr. Bob (rck@houston.rr.com)Date: 12/19/01
- Next message: Dr. Bob: "Re: Determining what should be blocked in and out?"
- Previous message: CyGho: "Re: Personal FW Recommendation"
- In reply to:(deleted message) cardiac: "Re: Which is better Zonealarm or Tiny Personal?"
- Next in thread: Dr. Bob: "Re: Which is better Zonealarm or Tiny Personal?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: rck@houston.rr.com (Dr. Bob) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:20:07 GMT
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:35:22 GMT, cardiac <dipsey-doodle@shaw.ca>
wrote:
>>:) I also don't recommend ZA because they ar working with
>>:)Broderbund/Mattel, a major spyware manufacturer. Although I've yet to
>>:)see proof that ZA deliberately has a backdoor to allow ZA to
>>:)"overlook" connections to Broderbunds' brodcast.net spyware service,
>>:)it is still a severe conflict-of-interest.
>To say nothing of it's collusion with Linksys routers (how good NAT
>protection with this setup?)
All Linksys does is let the user decide whether ZA is running. The
user can disable that if he wants. I would imagine that Linksys will
implement that feature for all the major PFs in the future.
>and it's forced collusion with Mickeysoft
>if they want to be XP compliant.
Every major vendor of Windows S/W has to pay the piper.
Dr. Bob
-- "Good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment."
- Next message: Dr. Bob: "Re: Determining what should be blocked in and out?"
- Previous message: CyGho: "Re: Personal FW Recommendation"
- In reply to:(deleted message) cardiac: "Re: Which is better Zonealarm or Tiny Personal?"
- Next in thread: Dr. Bob: "Re: Which is better Zonealarm or Tiny Personal?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
