Re: How does outpost compair to ZAP?

From: Ice Cap (icecap85@nospam.hotmail.com)
Date: 12/19/01


From: "Ice Cap" <icecap85@nospam.hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:03:57 -0500

There are two diffrent kinds of outgoing protection. One the firewall or ids
scans incoming and outgoing packets or connections for attacks and blocks
them. Two A firewall can do that and a diffrent kind of outgoing protection,
thats the application level of filtering, which might I add is useless.

"Michail Pappas" <invalid@dot.invalid> wrote in message
news:jyd71c7jlg.fsf@dot.invalid...
> "Ice Cap" <icecap85@nospam.hotmail.com> writes:
>
> | That sounds more like your opinion that a fact.
>
> Could you please point the exact passages you are refering to?
>
> If it is the hardware firewalls' ability to block outgoing accesses, I
> can just say that any decent hardware firewall will, _in fact_, filter
> outgoing traffic as well.
>
> Are your experiences different? If so, then I'd like to hear them...
>
> |
> | "Michail Pappas" <invalid@dot.invalid> wrote in message
> | news:MPG.1687eb1c391aaf15989683@news.grnet.gr...
> | > Excuse my indirect replies, but I did not have access to some
posters...
> | >
> | > In article <3C1D1287.829A55A3@istop.com>, anyone@istop.com says...
> | > | Ice Cap wrote:
> | > | >
> | > | > A very expensive firewall hard ware router does only what bid
does. It
> | > | > detects and blocks. It does not do outgoing so are you intending
that
> | cisco
> | > | > routers suck because they cant scan outgoing packets and manage
> | program
> | > | > internet access? Because when you imply that blackice sucks
because of
> | this
> | > | > you are in a way also implying that hardware routers are just as
bad.
> | > | >
> | >
> | > AFAIK this is not correct. Most hardware firewalls will block both
> | > incoming and outgoing traffic. Their pros/cons with respect to
software
> | > firewalls lie elsewhere.
> | >
> | > | > "S-o-Z" <yaggy4u@BEERhotmail.com> wrote in message
> | > | > news:3b6ed78c.2131303@news.S-o-Z.com...
> | > | > > Why use two firewalls in the first place? all you need is one
> | properly
> | > | > > configured firewall. (BID is not a firewall per say, it is only
an
> | > | > > intrusion derection service and does not detect outgoing
packets)
> | and
> | > | > > good firewall will do what BID does and more!
> | > | > >
> | >
> | > BID does offer two serious advantages, that is filtering at a level
> | > higher that the transport one for harmful traffic (for example, HTTP
> | > queries are checked for "bad" URLs) and automatic blocking
subsequently.
> | >
> | > | > > On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 14:34:49 -0400 (EDT), copet@webtv.net (Cody
> | Petry)
> | > | > > Cracked a cold one and typed:
> | > | > >
> | > | > > >Is outpost better than zap? Should I wait until outpost comes
out
> | of
> | > | > > >beta to try it. Right now I am using BID 2.5co and ZAP 2.6.228
> | together.
> | > | > > >No problems right now. I am also aware than I must remove these
to
> | use
> | > | > > >outpost.
> | >
> | > Since ZA+BID work ok for you, I wouldn't suggest jumping on another
> | > platform, unless you are in need of Outpost's extra features. I have
> | > Outpost installed and I am satisfied with it, but since your job _is_
> | > done without any problems you should think twice of which route should
be
> | > followed. Your choice...
> | >
> | > | I did check it and uninstall.
> | > | Outpost can not block ICMP packets 10/0 (router solicitation). i.e.:
> | > | 224.0.0.2
> | > | I remember that I did wrote to them about that months ago, but they
have
> | > | own philosophy of doing things.
> | >
> | > Don't get me wrong but "Months ago" is quite some time in Outpost's
> | > development time line. I'll check the router solicitation issue you've
> | > mentioned though, to see whether it has been implemented or, if not,
when
> | > it will be.
> | > --
> | > Michael.-
> |
> |
>
> --
> Michael.-



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Best free firewall
    ... How many posters were told to shut down outgoing scanning? ... WinXP's built-in firewall is barely adequate at stopping ... incoming attacks, and hiding your ports from probes. ... protect the computer user from him/herself. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Zone Alarm & Westell 327W
    ... >gateway is doing a great job protecting me. ... The 327W firewall wont allow any unsolicited incoming action to reach the ... 327W has the firewall in it, which filters both incoming and outgoing ... news, ftp), but it blocks outgoing Ping, ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: FIREWALLS
    ... I guess what I was looking for was a bit more on incoming and outgoing ... You mention outgoing trojan, but I think "outgoing" calls are important ... router and have the WinXP firewall activated....haven't tried it myself ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
  • Re: Firewalls.....
    ... So the Firewall that is built into XP is no good either... ... You need to protect yourself from ... >> outgoing requests as well as incoming ones. ... > you do need a personal firewall, ...
    (alt.computer.security)
  • Re: FIREWALLS
    ... resolve the issues associated with home networking (easily allows file/print ... you still want configurability mixed with the ability to monitor outgoing ... I like and use the E-Trust firewall on my laptops. ... > router and have the WinXP firewall activated....haven't tried it myself ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)