Re: What's wrong with Zonealarm?
From: Paul (paul.rankine@blueyonder.co.uk)Date: 12/18/01
- Next message: Walter Dnes: "Re: Anti Virus: Improving the current defense strategy."
- Previous message: Paul: "Re: What does this indicate? (LONG)"
- In reply to: Peter: "What's wrong with Zonealarm?"
- Next in thread: Ice Cap: "Re: What's wrong with Zonealarm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Paul" <paul.rankine@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 02:46:08 GMT
Oh I'm sure they will
--Regards Paul
"Peter" <jensid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:QkwT7.21782$_z.58354@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > I've used TPF and ZA and preferred ZA. I've installed Outpost today as there > are good reports here about it. I've used Gibson Research to probe my PC and > all 3 products come up with stealth. > > What I'm unclear about is what's wrong with ZA. Can Dr Bob or someone else > enlighten me? > >
- Next message: Walter Dnes: "Re: Anti Virus: Improving the current defense strategy."
- Previous message: Paul: "Re: What does this indicate? (LONG)"
- In reply to: Peter: "What's wrong with Zonealarm?"
- Next in thread: Ice Cap: "Re: What's wrong with Zonealarm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]