Re: How does outpost compair to ZAP?
From: anyone@istop.comDate: 12/16/01
- Previous message: Fiction: "Re: Norton personal firewall?"
- In reply to: Ice Cap: "Re: How does outpost compair to ZAP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: anyone@istop.com Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 16:30:47 -0500
Ice Cap wrote:
>
> A very expensive firewall hard ware router does only what bid does. It
> detects and blocks. It does not do outgoing so are you intending that cisco
> routers suck because they cant scan outgoing packets and manage program
> internet access? Because when you imply that blackice sucks because of this
> you are in a way also implying that hardware routers are just as bad.
>
> "S-o-Z" <yaggy4u@BEERhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b6ed78c.2131303@news.S-o-Z.com...
> > Why use two firewalls in the first place? all you need is one properly
> > configured firewall. (BID is not a firewall per say, it is only an
> > intrusion derection service and does not detect outgoing packets) and
> > good firewall will do what BID does and more!
> >
> > On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 14:34:49 -0400 (EDT), copet@webtv.net (Cody Petry)
> > Cracked a cold one and typed:
> >
> > >Is outpost better than zap? Should I wait until outpost comes out of
> > >beta to try it. Right now I am using BID 2.5co and ZAP 2.6.228 together.
> > >No problems right now. I am also aware than I must remove these to use
> > >outpost.
> > >
> > >Thanks for any info,
> > >Cody
> >
I did check it and uninstall.
Outpost can not block ICMP packets 10/0 (router solicitation). i.e.:
224.0.0.2
I remember that I did wrote to them about that months ago, but they have
own philosophy of doing things.
- Next message: Jari Lehtonen: "Re: This is really nasty!"
- Previous message: Fiction: "Re: Norton personal firewall?"
- In reply to: Ice Cap: "Re: How does outpost compair to ZAP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|