In fact what I would like to know if it's normal for this port (in
win2k). Today I saw that services was listening to port 1029 instead of
1028. Should I do some further research or just live with it. (I have a
firewall blocking the port anyway).
Re: Best Plan of action for 2 forest....... ...PortQry reports the status of a port in one of the following ways: .....LISTENING This response indicates that a process is listening on the target... (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
Re: RealVNC ... If we are talking about RealVNC it goes this way ... Then there is default Java listening port on port 5800 on the client machine... (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
Re: Cant join a domain ... Attempting to resolve name to IP address... ...TCP port 42: NOT LISTENING... (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
Re: Cant join a domain ... Attempting to resolve name to IP address... ...TCP port 42: NOT LISTENING... (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
Re: Cant connect to port 25 from another system ... The default sendmail config in RH/Fedora has been to only listen on the ... I previously edited the sendmail.mc file to be sure it is listening on ... Both netstat and nmap confirm that the system *is* listening on port... When I attempt to telnet to port 25 the connection fails. ... (Fedora)