Re: IT ethics in the workplace
From: Stan Brown (the_stan_brown_at_fastmail.fm)
Date: 03/26/05
- Previous message: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: IT ethics in the workplace"
- In reply to: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: IT ethics in the workplace"
- Next in thread: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: IT ethics in the workplace"
- Reply: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: IT ethics in the workplace"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:15:34 -0500
"" wrote in comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security:
>I have not worked in a place that monitors email, but I have studied it.
>I think you can't bury the fact that you monitor email in an employment
>contract and then pounce on someone out of the blue.
Why?
That=3Fs like saying (*)=3FI think you can=3Ft bury the fact that you
monitor employee use of telephone and the pounce on someone out of
the blue for making personal calls.=3F
Seems to me the default is that your employer=3Fs property is not for
your personal use. Te employer should not have to warn you not to
steal.
(*)Apologies for the garbage characters in the above message.
Gravity has not adapted well to Windows XP, and one of the
annoyances is that every once in a while it decides to change real
quotes to so-caled =3Fsmart quotes=3F. There isn=3Ft even a setting for
this in the options!
--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
- Previous message: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: IT ethics in the workplace"
- In reply to: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: IT ethics in the workplace"
- Next in thread: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: IT ethics in the workplace"
- Reply: Darko Gavrilovic: "Re: IT ethics in the workplace"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]