Re: NT4 - W2K Upgrade
From: M.Z. (bombadilski_at_netscape.net)
Date: 05/06/03
- Next message: news: "Fw: Partial implementation of Write ^ Execute on Windows to protect against malicious exploits of buffer overflow such as Code Red, SQL Slammer and WebDAV"
- Previous message: Jeff Cochran: "Re: NT4 - W2K Upgrade"
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: NT4 - W2K Upgrade"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 08:53:16 -0400
Jeff's right, your server might not be able to handle W2003 requirements as
well as W2K. And backUp is the most important part here.
"Jeff Cochran" <jcochran.nospam@naplesgov.com> wrote in message
news:3eb6c5dd.972865336@news.easynews.com...
> On Mon, 05 May 2003 17:41:10 GMT, "truocra" <clydes23@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Anybody mind giving me some pointers, warnings, advices about upgrading
from
> >NT4 to W2K OS.
>
> Depends a lot on what you have on the system and what you're trying to
> do. Best pointer is to have multiple good backups, just in case.
>
> >Would anyone recommend just waiting for Server2003?
>
> Some might. But an upgrade from W2K would be easier, though I'm a big
> fan of clean installs and migration.
>
> Jeff
- Next message: news: "Fw: Partial implementation of Write ^ Execute on Windows to protect against malicious exploits of buffer overflow such as Code Red, SQL Slammer and WebDAV"
- Previous message: Jeff Cochran: "Re: NT4 - W2K Upgrade"
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: NT4 - W2K Upgrade"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
