Re: net share
From: Rich marquette (rmarket@dca.net)
Date: 03/11/03
- Next message: Fred: "Killing a process without permission"
- Previous message: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- In reply to: Mark H. Wood: "Re: net share"
- Next in thread: Lik Mai Sak: "Re: net share"
- Reply: Lik Mai Sak: "Re: net share"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:50:17 -0500 From: Rich marquette <rmarket@dca.net>
Yes you are right, I meant net use I don't know why I typed net share!
Mark H. Wood wrote:
> Rich marquette <rmarket@dca.net> wrote:
>
>>Try
>>
>>Net share x: \\servername\Sharename /user:(domain)username
>>
>>I use it all the time
>
>
> You must be thinking of NET USE. NET SHARE has no such switch,
> although it does have /USERS:n which sets the maximum number of
> connections permitted.
>
> NET SHARE hasn't kept up with the development of Windows' networking
> model. There doesn't seem to be any way to set the ACL on the share
> with NET SHARE or any other NET command. The NET SHARE command
> probably just packages its arguments in a NET_SHARE_INFO_2 or
> NET_SHARE_INFO_502 structure and passes them to NetShareAdd(), and
> these structures only define a single permission mask and password for
> use with share-level security, which modern versions of Windows do not
> implement.
>
- Next message: Fred: "Killing a process without permission"
- Previous message: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- In reply to: Mark H. Wood: "Re: net share"
- Next in thread: Lik Mai Sak: "Re: net share"
- Reply: Lik Mai Sak: "Re: net share"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
