Re: Separation of applications under NT
From: Ron Ruble (raffles2@att.net)
Date: 03/07/03
- Previous message: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- In reply to: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- Next in thread: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- Reply: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Ron Ruble" <raffles2@att.net> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:23:48 -0500
"BigBart" <bigbart5@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OzP9a.34$ND3.12347@newsfep2-gui...
<snip>
> So what if the two apps actually communicate (exchange messages)
> between each other? Is it safe to say that because they are both
> running on the same machine, and are 32-bit, App_B (containing less
> sensitive information) cannot get at info held in App_A's protected
> memory space?
Messaging is irrelevant. Messages are marshaled
(copied) from one address space to the other by
the OS.
App_B can only access the information App_A
makes available to it. Certainly, the writer of
App_A may choose to expose sensitive information
carelessly, but this would be a defect in App_A,
not a feature of the OS. It should be noted that
App_A is not rigidly protected against App_B
in a normal situation, where the user has
Administrator privileges (or Power User
privileges). Both accounts have the right to
open a process token. But an ordinary
user account does not.
This is a _very_ involved subject; if you are
really interested, I would direct you to "Programming
Applications For Windows", by Jeffrey Richter
and Windows NT Server Unleashed, for
information on NT security.
- Previous message: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- In reply to: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- Next in thread: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- Reply: BigBart: "Re: Separation of applications under NT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|