Re: Password Cracking

From: Ernst-Udo Wallenborn (ernst-udo.wallenborn@freenet.de)
Date: 01/23/03


From: Ernst-Udo Wallenborn <ernst-udo.wallenborn@freenet.de>
Date: 23 Jan 2003 21:49:50 +0100


"Lohkee" <Lohkee@worldnet.att.net> writes:

> You statement is absolutelty FALSE. I have stated, and maintain, that
> password strength is a function of the number of possiblities in the pool.
> The greater the number, the "stronger" a given password - a FACT which is
> easily proven by mathamatical analysis, although I must admit, I do wish
> lottery people would use your method.

This is simply not true.

-- 
Ernst-Udo Wallenborn


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Password Cracking
    ... > You statement is absolutelty FALSE. ... > password strength is a function of the number of possiblities in the pool. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: Password Cracking
    ... > You statement is absolutelty FALSE. ... > password strength is a function of the number of possiblities in the pool. ...
    (comp.security.misc)