Re: Which is more secure XP or W2K Pro?

From: davide@yahoo.com
Date: 10/24/02 

From: davide@yahoo.com
Date: 24 Oct 2002 06:42:12 GMT

Chris <chris@logistyx.com> wrote:
> that would make W2K more or less secure than XP.

The fact that 2K is going to be discontinued next year, so "security"
problems have less priority than XP, could be a fact.

AFAIK and for what I'm concerned, both are insecure the same. If you
want a "secure" OS go to Unix.

Davide

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Unix vs. Windows Security
    ... and b) security will mean Internet security. ... There are some core issues at the heart of the UNIX vs. Windows security ... Neither were ever designed to be secure. ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows for Security
    ... maintain in a secure environment. ... security problems. ... > Unix is a multiuser operating system, so out of the box it is far from ... > don't have that multiuser shell ability on Windows you have on Unix. ...
    (comp.security.unix)
  • Re: Ten least secure programs
    ... it's probably better you leave the topic alone ... I said I do not have security issues with the programs I code. ... I didn't realize you were a Linux user, ... > the most widely used and secure UNIX flavors? ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • "An Asp.Net accident waiting to happen" - Draft article
    ... In a time where Security ... in shared hosting environments. ... technologies that allow the creation and deployment of secure ... IIS 6 web server and windows 2003 also provide some tools to deploy ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.security)
  • RE: Why Easy To Use Software Is Putting You At Risk
    ... I do agree that the additions and changes to Solarius will make it more secure and that this is good. ... Why Easy To Use Software Is Putting You At Risk ... instead I would say that the view that security is ... Four Construction Workers Died after Crane Collapse in Toledo, ...
    (Security-Basics)