Re: Which is more secure XP or W2K Pro?
From: Chris (chris@logistyx.com)Date: 10/23/02
- Next message: : "Re: Ethereal Capture Decoding"
- Previous message: chris@nospam.com: "Re: Ethereal Capture Decoding"
- In reply to: davide@yahoo.com: "Re: Which is more secure XP or W2K Pro?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Chris" <chris@logistyx.com> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:19:40 -0500
The University of California Santa Barbara recently banned the use of W2K in
favor of XP sighting security issues. I was curious what differences exist
between the two products that would make W2K more or less secure than XP.
Here is the link for your review and comments:
http://www.securitynewsportal.com/cgi-bin/cgi-script/csNews/csNews.cgi?datab
ase=JanS.db&command=viewone&id=66&op=t
Thanks,
Chris
<davide@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ap6cru$rsprl$5@ID-18487.news.dfncis.de...
> Chris <chris@logistyx.com> wrote:
> > Which product is more secure on a corporate lan, XP or Win2k Pro?
>
> Please, explain what you mean for "secure".
>
> Davide
- Next message: : "Re: Ethereal Capture Decoding"
- Previous message: chris@nospam.com: "Re: Ethereal Capture Decoding"
- In reply to: davide@yahoo.com: "Re: Which is more secure XP or W2K Pro?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
