Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable
From: those who know me have no need of my name (not-a-real-address@usa.net)Date: 09/12/02
- Next message: Christoph: "Re: problems to install inf files under windows xp automaticially"
- Previous message: John: "Re: How can I map a drive without being logged into the machine?"
- In reply to: Alun Jones: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: those who know me have no need of my name <not-a-real-address@usa.net> Date: 12 Sep 2002 01:47:22 GMT
[fu-t set]
in sci.crypt i read:
>Compile-time constants should be held in compile-time values. "sizeof(type)"
>is a compile-time constant, and as such should be held in a #define macro, or
>if you really feel the need for type protection on such a value, in a "const
>int".
itym a const size_t.
-- bringing you boring signatures for 17 years
- Next message: Christoph: "Re: problems to install inf files under windows xp automaticially"
- Previous message: John: "Re: How can I map a drive without being logged into the machine?"
- In reply to: Alun Jones: "Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading